Saturday, November 26, 2016

The Electoral College and Protection from Left Wing Tyranny

This Sarcasm Just In...

The Electoral College and Protection from Left Wing Tyranny

By Bathhouse John for Vox Populi | November 26, 2016 at 12 PM (“High Noon”)

"Government had to recognize significant opposing interests and give each a sufficient power to protect itself." ("The Summer of 1787", David O. Stewart, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2007.)

The Democratic Nazi Party of America and their Fuhrer, globalist goober, George Soros, are shaking in their jackboots. Dr. Jill "Pothead" Stein, undoubtedly pushed and paid for by the Globalist Goober, George Soros, the Democratic Nazi Party of America, lame ducker, President Obama, and naturally the Clinton Crime Family, "raised money" for a recount in Wisconsin, and possibly Michigan and Pennsylvania  . . . where the Queen of Corruption lost a close election in spite of the voter fraud sanctioned and promoted by the Fleece in Chief himself, Barack.  

Further, a lot has been said about whether or not the Electoral College is necessary and in fact "undemocratic" and that, we're it not a part of our election process, so decry the Alt Left, Hillary Clinton Crooked Hillary (HC2H - the perfect formula for corruption) would now be poised to "carry on Obama's legacy." Let's examine that and other issues.

If we were to just count the popular vote, it appears on the grainy surface that HC2H would have won, however that does not take into account the potential millions of illegals and jackbooted "Blue Shirts" hired by the DNPA to defraud the working taxpayers once again viz-z-viz dead voters, multiple voters, ballot box stuffing, etc.  By all accounts, Trump might have actually won by the inverse difference these radicals are claiming. Now, Chicago, New York and Los Angeles alone, strongholds of the DNPA - urban, welfarized, illegal alien infused - are true democratic strongholds if you throw in the stupid working taxpayers and the greedy globalist 1%ers who support them, too.

Now . . . why should a moderate to conservative suburban, and/or rural voter have to live by the rules that govern a left wing urban voter? Or vice versa? They should not. When the Fleece in Chief signs his cheap signature to expensive office paper and creates another "executive order" (ie. because he has no legal ground to stand on), and which only benefits the radical left end of the spectrum - his followers - for greedy, selfish reasons, why should all Americans have to suffer? (Think: transgender bathroom issue or illegal aliens.) Likewise, just because a majority of crazy Californians, New Yorkers and Illinoisans vote for the Queen of Corruption, why should voters in those same states all feel like they are forced to do the same? They don't - if the electoral college operates properly.

Originally designed to create a balance between the slave states and the free states, ironically the EC currently serves to balance the slave powers (DNPA, George Soros, and their ilk)  and the free, the working taxpayers. The Electoral College currently operates on a "winner-take-all" scenario (with the exception of Maine)  which means if HC2H wins 51 votes out of 100 - she gets all of the electoral votes from say California (55, a number which represents the total number of representatives and senators). The EC (the rhetorical opposite of EBT) was designed to protect the voice of the minority from the majority (Just like in 2016 - the working taxpayers from the greedy DNPA welfare state). But what about the Willing Welfare Class and their offshoot, the Illegal Alien Class? Don't they deserve the freebies galore as much as we working taxpayers deserve to not have to pay for them? Yes and yes. OK, and?

Back to the EC. Though I stereotype a wee bit, urban voters want to live their lives in a certain left wing, hybridized Road Warrior-3 Stooges sort of way; sad and demented, but nevertheless their choice. And suburban/rural voters want to live their lives in a certain moderate to right wing way, kinda traditional, and nevertheless their choice. Consider the following adaptations which would make the process fairer for both sides:

1/ Eliminate the EC altogether if every voter, like a driver of a motor vehicle, had to have a VOTER ID to eliminate the DNPA (OK, or perhaps the Repubs) from soiling if not stealing the elections. This specious argument that IDs are racist, discriminatory, etc, is only valid if eating Borscht soup at George Soros' Globalist Summit held every year in his one acre outhouse. This adaptation would vaguely represent “one man, one vote.” More on that below.

2/ Each state could award the electors based upon the winning percentage of the popular vote per candidate (like Maine).

3/ Each county could award one elector based upon the winning percentage of the popular vote per candidate. I would strongly argue that this concept could also be used to pass all tax laws and would be much fairer to the working taxpayers actually paying for the cost increases levied by said taxes.

The one man-one vote argument is erroneous to be sure. For example, Los Angeles County has a large percentage of inhabitants that pay little if any direct taxes. Wait! False, some Lefties cry out. Hold on: if the working taxpayers give tax money to Citizen Q that they use to buy a TV and in the process pay a sales tax, the working taxpayer actually pays the tax. It's that simple. The recent plastic bag tax that the Golden Fleece State recently instituted, to reportedly "stem the tide of plastic bag malfeasance", EXCLUDES EBT ("Eat Better Today") users but, you guessed it, not the working taxpayers.

Urban areas are over inflated population centers and therefore one cannot say that 10 million L.A. County residents have the right to tell 19,o00 Inyo County residents how to live, let alone how to spend their money. Consider this crazy scenario: a law raising a per household tax on electricity use is instituted but because 15 people live at 1520 Los Angeles Drive and only 4 live in 1588 Inyo Road that the rate in the former is lower per capita due to higher numbers and higher in the latter due to lower numbers. Confused? It is what occurs daily to the working taxpayers in this country.

As an aside, it could be argued that only those who work (or worked and now retired) and pay taxes should be able to vote on any tax measures. The current situation allows the DNPA's base constituency with "no skin in the game," the ever ballooning Willing Welfare Class and their off shoot, the Illegals, to vote newer tax laws into existence - to benefit themselves - knowing full well they do not have to pay for that tax. Talk about DNPA tyranny!

In closing, unless reforms are adopted as described above, the Electoral College is a wholeheartedly democratic institution which protects the minority, the largely moderate to right wing suburban/rural voters from the tyranny of the monstrous majority, the largely left wing, DNPA dependent urban voters.

Let’s look at a basic county by county analysis of the 2016 Election results. This is an eye opener and the ratios are approximate. (See: State/County Results) If you have nothing but time on your hands, analyze the individual county results as well. No wonder our country is divided and the working taxpayers are angry; their hands are being raked in the California-style welfare wildfire.

State/County By County Results...
California by county (2-1 HC2H/Greatest Welfare state in the history of the world!)
Washington State (2-1 Trump)
Oregon (3-1 Trump)
Nevada (6-1 Trump)
Colorado (2-1 Trump)
New Mexico (2-1 Trump)
Illinois (3-1 Trump)
Minnesota (3-1 Trump)
Virginia (3-1 Trump)
New York (2-1 Trump)

How do we protect the rights of the working taxpayers who pay the bills from those who want us to pay, and pay, and pay, and pay...?

Unless you’re a Willing Welfare Lifer, 1%er, or just plain stupid, don’t be fooled by the Democratic Nazi Party of America, or their presidential selection, Barack Obama. The globalists are running scared. Yeah, well, Donald J. Trump is no angel but his worst traits are saintly compared to the DNPA’s best. If you don’t take that to the bank, the DNPA will take you to the cleaners - and along for a Chicago-style “one way ride.”


© 2016 Vox Populi. All laughs reserved on content crafted anew. Whether you like or hate what you read, feel free to share this with your friends and enemies. The 2016 Election is personal and as an Indie Voter . . . I support President-Elect Donald J. Trump. (jvhoffmannjr.blogspot.com)


No comments:

Post a Comment